AGCO Corporation (AGCO) Insider, 13F Hedge Fund & Politician Buy/Sell Thermometer

Per the Roarable RQD rating, AGCO scores 58 out of 100, a letter grade of D+, with the verdict label "Roarable Sell — Weak Fundamentals / Trim." The five pillars are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine: 11 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects ROIC of 8.2% and an FCF yield of 9.8%. Returns on capital are positive but modest, and the cash yield is the strongest element here, which suggests the stock's valuation is supported by cash generation rather than by reported earnings growth.
• Whale 13F Flow: 8 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar covers institutional accumulation and options positioning. A score below midpoint indicates limited evidence of sustained institutional buying conviction in the source data.
• Insider Conviction: 17 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, this is the highest pillar and reflects SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow. This is a relative strength in the rating, though the underlying trade-level detail is not included in the source data.
• Macro Regime Fit: 9 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects a beta of 1.08 and sector sensitivity. A beta slightly above 1.0 means the stock has tended to move a bit more than the broader market, which increases exposure to macro swings.
• Forensic Balance Sheet: 13 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects an Altman Z-Score of 2.48, a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, and a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.54. These are generally supportive readings of financial health.

For a prospective investor evaluating the stock today, the rating points to a mixed picture: a reasonable cash-yield and balance-sheet foundation, offset by weak institutional flow and a macro profile that amplifies market moves. Valuation metrics (P/E TTM of 10.4 and Forward P/E of 9.7 per the market data) appear low relative to the price, but the rating's verdict signals that fundamentals, on balance, do not yet justify a constructive stance. Upside drivers would need to come from improving operating margins and renewed institutional accumulation; the valuation tradeoff is that a low multiple can reflect expectations of continued earnings pressure.

Per the SEC financials, revenue declined across the three reported periods, from $14412.4M in FY 2023 to $10082.0M in FY 2025. Operating income and net income were negative in FY 2024 and turned positive in FY 2025 ($595.7M and $726.5M respectively). Per the market data, gross margin is 25.5%, operating margin is 5.9%, and net margin is 7.2%, with ROIC at 8.2%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 2.48 and the Piotroski F-Score is 7/9. Debt/Equity is 0.54 per the rating's forensic pillar, and reported debt has declined from $4047.0M in FY 2023 to $2323.1M in FY 2025.

• What drove the revenue decline from $14412.4M in FY 2023 to $10082.0M in FY 2025, and is the recovery referenced in the news wire expected to reverse it?
• What is the basis for the federal inquiry flagged in the RED risk item, and what is its potential scope?
• Why is EPS reported as N/A for all periods when net income and share data would typically support a per-share figure?
• What are the specific guidance figures referenced in the "cut guidance" headline, and how do they compare with prior guidance?
• What is the composition of institutional and insider holdings, given that the holders section is empty?