Why VFC Stock slipped -0.16% Today — RQD Quant Desk Flash

Per the Roarable RQD rating, VFC scores 58 out of 100, a D+ grade labeled "Roarable Sell — Weak Fundamentals / Trim." The five pillars are: Fundamental Cash Engine at 13/20 (ROIC 11.5%; FCF yield 3.31%), Whale 13F Flow at 14/20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning), Insider Conviction at 14/20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow), Macro Regime Fit at 7/20 (Beta 0.95; sector sensitivity), and Forensic Balance Sheet at 10/20 (Altman Z 1.7; Piotroski F 7/9; Debt/Equity 2.04). The Macro Regime Fit pillar is the weakest relative to its maximum, and the forensic pillar reflects leverage metrics that sit in the weaker part of the scale. Taken together, the rating signals that the stock's fundamental and balance-sheet support is limited at the current price, while institutional and insider flow scores are comparatively better. For a prospective investor, the implication is that upside depends on whether the cash-generation and flow signals can offset elevated leverage and the sector-sensitivity drag captured in the rating. This is an educational reading of the rating, not personalized advice.

V.F. Corporation is classified in the Industrials sector, Garments and Clothing industry, and is listed on the NYSE. Per the profile, the company operates in apparel and clothing. The source data does not itemize product lines, customer segments, or revenue mix, and it does not describe how the company monetizes beyond the reported gross margin of 54.8%.

Per the SEC financials, reported revenue moved from $9915.7M in FY 2023 to $9605.2M in FY 2025, while operating income turned positive from $-143.9M to $576.6M over the same span. Net income improved to $254.9M in FY 2025 after losses in the prior two periods. Per the market data, the net margin is 2.7%, the operating margin is 6%, and ROIC is 11.5%. The Altman Z-Score of 1.7 and Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 are cited within the Roarable rating pillars, and the Debt/Equity ratio of 2.04 is also cited there; the source does not provide the underlying calculations. Reported debt of $3891.2M against cash of $1466.5M in FY 2025 indicates a substantial net debt position.

Per the recent news feed, the key items are:

• Vans brand turnaround (GREEN, CATALYST): A GuruFocus report describes shares rising 4% on upgrades highlighting a Vans turnaround.
• Price target raise (GREEN, CATALYST): A TradingView report describes a 12-month price target raised to $18.25, implying 7% upside.
• Cash-flow valuation (GREEN, CATALYST): A Simply Wall St report frames the stock as a cash-flow bargain.
• Q2 earnings (YELLOW, MARKET WIRE): A grafa.com report cites Q2 earnings of $0.70 per share.
• Fiscal 2027 Q2 earnings date (YELLOW, MARKET WIRE): A Yahoo Finance report announces the Q2 Fiscal 2027 earnings and conference call date.
• Divestiture commentary (YELLOW, MARKET WIRE): A Seeking Alpha report argues that the Active brand should be divested.

Risk watch items include the divestiture debate and the leverage metrics noted above. Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is recorded as "NONE," with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals.

• What is the breakdown of the reported $9605.2M revenue across brands and channels, and how much is attributable to the Vans turnaround?
• What drives the gap between the $0.65 TTM EPS and the reported $254.9M net income, and why is the FY 2025 EPS field N/A?
• What is the source calculation behind the Altman Z-Score of 1.7 and the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, and how is the Debt/Equity ratio of 2.04 derived?
• Is there analyst consensus, price target distribution, or 13F/insider holder data beyond the single price-target headline?
• What is the cash balance for FY 2023, which is reported as N/A, and how does the debt trend reconcile across periods?