Orangekloud Technology Inc. (Class A) (ORKT) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, ORKT scores 30 out of 100 with a letter grade of E, labeled "Roarable Strong Sell — Forensic Risk / Avoid." The five pillars are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine (3 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects ROIC of -35% and FCF yield of 0%. This is the weakest pillar and indicates the business is not currently generating returns on invested capital or free cash flow relative to its value.
• Whale 13F Flow (6 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar covers institutional accumulation and options positioning. The low score signals limited supportive institutional flow.
• Insider Conviction (5 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar covers SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow. The low score signals weak insider conviction signals in the data.
• Macro Regime Fit (8 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects a beta of 1.0 and sector sensitivity. The score is modest and does not offer a clear macro tailwind.
• Forensic Balance Sheet (8 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects Altman Z of 0.2, Piotroski F of 4/9, and Debt/Equity of 0.5. The Altman Z reading is in the distress range, and the Piotroski reading is below the midpoint.

Investment implications: the upside case rests on a turnaround in the Fundamental Cash Engine, which the data does not yet show. Valuation tradeoffs are unclear because P/E and EPS are not available in source data, but a stock trading at $1 with a $5.8M market cap and negative operating margin offers little earnings support. Forensic balance sheet concerns mean downside risk is elevated. This is an educational summary of the rating, not personalized advice.

Per the SEC financials, revenue rose from $3.0M in FY 2024 to $4.4M in FY 2025, while operating income improved from $-6.4M to $-5.8M. Per the market data, operating margin and net margin are both -60% and ROIC is -35%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 0.2 and the Piotroski F-Score is 4/9, with Debt/Equity of 0.5. Balance sheet cash declined from $6.0M to $2.3M across the two reported periods, and debt figures are not available in source data.

Per the recent news and catalysts feed, the items are:

• A TradingView estimates report on ORKT (YELLOW, MARKET WIRE).
• A Yahoo Finance "Top Premarket Decliners" item (YELLOW, MARKET WIRE).
• A ChartMill item on pre-market activity (YELLOW, MARKET WIRE).
• A Stock Titan report stating revenue fell 2.5% while the first-half net loss narrowed (RED, RISK WATCH).
• A Yahoo! Finance Canada seasonal chart item tied to a different ticker in its headline (YELLOW, MARKET WIRE).
• A TradingKey stock list item (YELLOW, MARKET WIRE).

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals. The RED risk-watch item is the most material catalyst in the feed. The remaining items are market-wire coverage with no substantive fundamental content.

• What are the reported EPS, P/E, and EV/EBITDA figures, given that these fields are unavailable in the source data?
• What is the company's debt position, since debt is reported as N/A in both periods?
• What drove the decline in cash from $6.0M to $2.3M, and what is the runway at the current FCF burn rate?
• Who are the customers and suppliers, and is there concentration risk the Butterfly graph does not map?
• What is the nature of the 52-week range and recent price moves, and are there institutional or insider holdings to assess?