Data Storage Corporation (DTST) Insider, 13F Hedge Fund & Politician Buy/Sell Thermometer

Per the Roarable RQD rating, DTST carries an RQD Score of 27 with a letter grade of E, labeled "Roarable Strong Sell — Forensic Risk / Avoid." The five pillars are scored as follows:

• Fundamental Cash Engine: 3 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, ROIC is -7.3% and FCF yield is 0%. This is the weakest pillar and indicates the business is not currently converting capital into returns or free cash flow. For a prospective investor, the upside case must rest on a future turnaround rather than present cash generation.
• Whale 13F Flow: 6 / 20. The RQD summary describes institutional accumulation and options positioning, but the holders section in the source data is empty, so the underlying flow cannot be independently verified here. A low score combined with unverifiable accumulation suggests limited institutional conviction.
• Insider Conviction: 5 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR flow is weak. Insider activity offers little evidence that people closest to the company see near-term value.
• Macro Regime Fit: 7 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, beta is 1.0 with sector sensitivity noted. The stock moves in line with the market, so it offers no defensive cushion, and its small scale adds further volatility risk.
• Forensic Balance Sheet: 6 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, Altman Z is 2.74, Piotroski F is 3/9, and Debt/Equity is 0.5. These figures sit in a mixed zone: the leverage ratio is moderate, but the Piotroski score is weak, indicating deteriorating fundamental quality.

Taken together, the pillars point to a stock where the cash engine, insider signal, and forensic quality are all weak, with only modest support from balance-sheet leverage. The valuation tradeoff is that a $7.2M market capitalization is small enough to move sharply on limited volume (997 shares traded in the snapshot), which magnifies both upside surprises and downside risk. The 2nd-order implication is that any positive catalyst would need to overcome a -60% operating margin before it translates into shareholder value.

Data Storage Corporation is a NASDAQ-listed issuer classified under the Technology sector and EDP Services industry, per the profile section. The company's product and customer details are not described in the source data. The source data does not specify how the company generates revenue beyond its reported revenue figures.

Per the SEC financials, revenue fell from $25.0M in FY 2023 to $1.2M in FY 2024 before recovering to $1.4M in FY 2025, while operating income remained negative in each reported year. Per the market data, gross margin is 44.4%, operating margin is -60%, and net margin is 0%, with ROIC at -7.3%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 2.74, the Piotroski F-Score is 3/9, and Debt/Equity is 0.5. Per the SEC financials, FY 2025 free cash flow was $-3.2M against cash of $2.0M, so the balance sheet relies on reported cash rather than internally generated funds.

Three market-wire items reference DTST, each published within the last six hours and each carrying a YELLOW light. The headlines are "Data Storage Corporation Estimates – NASDAQ:DTST" (TradingView), "Cycurion, Inc. (CYCU) Seasonal Returns Chart - Yahoo Finance" (Yahoo! Finance Canada), and "Cycurion, Inc. (CYCU) Seasonal returns chart - Yahoo Finance" (Yahoo Finance Singapore). The first is the only item directly about DTST estimates; the other two are headlined around a different issuer's seasonal chart and are summarized as DTST market-action coverage, so they carry low informational value on their own. The butterfly supply-chain graph reports no supply chain, no butterfly links, and no proprietary signals. Risk watch items are therefore limited to the negative operating margin, the sub-$10M market capitalization, and the thin trading volume shown in the snapshot.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is recorded as NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals. Upstream and downstream dependencies, sector correlations, and second-order bottlenecks are therefore not available in source data. The company is classified in the Technology sector and EDP Services industry, but the source data does not map which suppliers, customers, or peers transmit shocks to DTST. A prospective investor should treat this absence as a gap in the analysis rather than evidence of an isolated business.

• What products or services generate the FY 2025 revenue of $1.4M, and why did revenue decline from $25.0M in FY 2023?
• What is the reported debt balance, since the financials list debt as N/A for every period?
• Why are P/E, EPS, and EV/EBITDA unavailable, and what are the actual earnings figures given the reported net income and N/A EPS?
• What institutional holders and insider transactions underlie the RQD whale and insider pillar scores, given that the holders section is empty?
• What is the source of the Piotroski F-Score and the cash balance trend, given that FY 2023 and FY 2025 cash are reported inconsistently?