Global X Uranium ETF (URA) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, URA scores 26 out of 100, graded E, labeled "Roarable Strong Sell — Forensic Risk / Avoid (ETF Composite Methodology)." The five pillars are: Fundamental Cash Engine at 4/20 (ROIC 0%; FCF yield 0%), Whale 13F Flow at 8/20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning), Insider Conviction at 4/20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow), Macro Regime Fit at 6/20 (Beta 1.0; sector sensitivity), and Forensic Balance Sheet at 4/20 (Altman Z 2.5; Piotroski F 6/9; Debt/Equity 0.5).

For a prospective investor, the composite points to weak scores across the cash-generation and insider-conviction pillars, with the strongest relative reading coming from institutional flow and macro fit. Because this is an ETF, the ROIC and FCF yield of 0% reflect the fund wrapper rather than an operating business, so these pillar scores should be read as a methodology output rather than a direct measure of the underlying uranium producers. The Beta of 1.0 indicates the fund is in line with broad market volatility per the market data. The 1.3% dividend yield is the only income metric reported. Upside drivers would have to come from sector sentiment and flow dynamics; the source data does not provide earnings-based valuation support, and the P/E and EV/EBITDA fields are unavailable.

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is an exchange-traded fund listed on the NYSE. Per the profile, it is a liquid institutional fund tracking Nuclear Power & Uranium Miners, with approximately $3.9B in assets under management. Sector is ETF / Index and industry is Nuclear Power & Uranium Miners. Per the profile, the fund's role is exposure to the nuclear power and uranium mining theme. Revenue and product-level details are not available in source data.

Per the recent news and catalysts section, five headlines were logged, all tagged to URA:

• "Nuclear stock ETFs NLR and URA: Buy amid oversold conditions?" (Investing.com; YELLOW; MARKET WIRE)
• "Global X Uranium ETF Estimates – BCBA:URA" (TradingView; YELLOW; MARKET WIRE)
• "Energy Fuels Falls 9% as Uranium and Reactor Names Sell Off Together; Oklo and Centrus Energy Drop 5%" (Yahoo Finance; RED; RISK WATCH)
• "The 'Other Yellow Metal': Why Speculators Are Loading on Uranium" (Benzinga; YELLOW; MARKET WIRE)
• "5 Best Nuclear Energy Stocks and ETFs to Buy | Investing" (US News Money; YELLOW; MARKET WIRE)

The one RISK WATCH item concerns a sector sell-off in which uranium and reactor names declined together, with a 9% drop cited for Energy Fuels and a 5% drop for Oklo and Centrus Energy. The remaining headlines are MARKET WIRE items with YELLOW signals, mostly framing the sector as oversold or as a speculative target. The Butterfly supply-chain graph reports no supply chain and no proprietary signals.

• What is the underlying holdings composition of the fund, and how are weightings distributed across uranium miners versus nuclear power names?
• What are the period-level revenue, earnings, and cash-flow figures for the fund's constituents or the fund's own reported financials?
• What is the fund's expense ratio and tracking performance relative to its index?
• Which institutional 13F and insider filings are associated with URA, and what are their size and direction?
• What supply-chain links connect uranium supply, reactor demand, and fund flows that the Butterfly graph does not currently map?